Skip to content
Global Access Atlas

Compare market pathways

Align systems by decision stage without forcing them into one universal route.

South Korea
Japan
Germany
United States
Structural contrast

🇰🇷 South Korea:MFDS authorization, HIRA reimbursement assessment, NHIS price/contract negotiation and MOHW listing are separate; RSA, use-volume and flexible pricing solve different problems.; 🇯🇵 Japan:Japan uses rules-based NHI price listing after approval; selective cost-effectiveness assessment adjusts price after listing rather than acting as a universal coverage gate.; 🇩🇪 Germany:GKV access begins at launch, while AMNOG benefit assessment and reimbursement negotiation determine the later price; the 2026 reform adds mandatory price-volume terms and fund-specific patent-group contracting.; 🇺🇸 United States:Choose benefit, payer and site of care before drawing the pathway; the United States has no single national reimbursement decision.

RegulatoryHTA / assessmentPrice / negotiationCoveragePost-listing

South Korea

MFDS authorization, HIRA reimbursement assessment, NHIS price/contract negotiation and MOHW listing are separate; RSA, use-volume and flexible pricing solve different problems.

1
RegulatoryVerified
Marketing authorizationMFDS

Output: Marketing authorization and label

Scope: Korean regulatory supply

2
HTA / assessmentVerified
Reimbursement suitability assessmentHIRA

Output: Reimbursement suitability and evidence conclusion

Scope: National Health Insurance benefit proposal

3
HTA / assessmentVerified
RSA / CEA exemption eligibilityHIRA / MOHW rules

Output: Eligibility for a defined exceptional assessment or agreement route

Scope: Eligible disease, product and evidence conditions only

4
Price / negotiationVerified
Price negotiation and contractingNHIS

Output: Reimbursement price and applicable contract

Scope: NHI listing and contracted conditions

5
CoverageVerified
NHI listing noticeMOHW

Output: Final NHI listing, price and conditions

Scope: National benefit under notice terms

6
Post-listingVerified
Post-listing managementNHIS / HIRA / MOHW

Output: Use-volume, expenditure, evidence or contract adjustment

Scope: Mechanism-specific product and period

Evidence checked 2026-08-01

Japan

Japan uses rules-based NHI price listing after approval; selective cost-effectiveness assessment adjusts price after listing rather than acting as a universal coverage gate.

1
RegulatoryVerified
New drug approvalPMDA / MHLW

Output: Marketing approval and label

Scope: Approved Japanese indication

2
HTA / assessmentVerified
NHI listing and pricing reviewMHLW / Chuikyo

Output: Eligibility and applicable pricing method

Scope: National health insurance listing

3
Price / negotiationVerified
Initial NHI drug priceMHLW

Output: One official reimbursement price under the pricing rules

Scope: NHI claims for the listed product

4
Post-listingVerified
Cost-effectiveness evaluationCEA expert groups / Chuikyo

Output: ICER appraisal and post-listing price adjustment

Scope: Only designated products/indications and price-adjustment scope

5
Post-listingVerified
Biennial / special price revisionMHLW / Chuikyo

Output: Revised NHI price

Scope: Products meeting survey/rule conditions

Evidence checked 2026-08-13

Germany

GKV access begins at launch, while AMNOG benefit assessment and reimbursement negotiation determine the later price; the 2026 reform adds mandatory price-volume terms and fund-specific patent-group contracting.

1
RegulatoryVerified
EU marketing authorizationEMA / European Commission

Output: Union marketing authorization

Scope: Approved indication across EU/EEA as applicable

2
HTA / assessmentVerified
AMNOG dossier at first placing on marketManufacturer / G-BA

Output: Evidence package for added-benefit assessment

Scope: GKV target population and comparator subgroups

3
HTA / assessmentVerified
Zusatznutzen resolutionG-BA

Output: Binding added-benefit resolution by subgroup

Scope: GKV price negotiation and prescribing information

4
Price / negotiationVerified
Erstattungsbetrag and price-volume termsGKV-Spitzenverband / manufacturer

Output: National reimbursement amount plus negotiated or statutory price-volume rule

Scope: GKV supply; negotiated scope and statutory rules

5
Price / negotiationVerified
Patent-group rebate contract branchSickness fund / association / prescriber

Output: Tendered contract and preferred medicine within an eligible therapeutic group

Scope: Fund/group/product-specific; medical exception remains

6
CoverageCheck scope
NUB / ZE hospital fundingInEK / hospitals / sickness funds

Output: Temporary innovation status or additional payment route

Scope: Named hospital, case and DRG context

Evidence checked 2026-08-13

United States

Choose benefit, payer and site of care before drawing the pathway; the United States has no single national reimbursement decision.

1
RegulatoryVerified
NDA / BLA approvalFDA

Output: Marketing authorization and approved label

Scope: Federal legal supply boundary

2
HTA / assessmentVerified
Coverage policy / formulary decisionCMS, MAC, state Medicaid or health plan

Output: National/local coverage rule or plan formulary status

Scope: Named payer, benefit, indication and population

3
CoverageVerified
HCPCS / NDC operational codingCMS or plan / pharmacy network

Output: Billable product/service identity

Scope: Claim route and setting; not coverage itself

4
Price / negotiationVerified
ASP / WAC / AMP / URA / MFP / 340B layerCMS, manufacturer, Medicaid and federal programmes

Output: Distinct statutory or commercial price metric

Scope: Metric-specific products, payers and transactions

5
Price / negotiationVerified
Contracting and utilization managementManufacturer, PBM, plan and provider

Output: Rebate/contract plus PA, step edit or site-of-care rule

Scope: Named plan, channel, provider and member

6
CoverageCheck scope
First funded patientPlan, provider and dispensing/acquisition channel

Output: Authorized treatment, paid claim and available product

Scope: Individual patient at a capable site

Evidence checked 2026-08-01